<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Bush</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/bush</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Bush Executive Order Exempts Some Federal Employees from Monopoly Bargaining: Too Little Too Late?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bush-executive-order-too-little-too-late-12022008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Yesterday President Bush issued an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/12/print/20081201-7.html&quot;&gt;Exectuive Order&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span&gt;exempting several agencies and subdivisions of the Energy, Homeland Security, Justice, Transportation, and Treasury departments from draconian and stifling federal labor-management relations strictures.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is good policy.  However, while freeing any worker from forced union monopoly bargaining is a welcome step, the last-minute move begs the question: &lt;b&gt;What took so long?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Unfortunately, making this common-sense change on the way out the door cheapens it, making it appear to be little more than political retaliation.  The administration should have made this and many more pro-individual-rights moves long ago.  Instead, the incompetent political managers in the White House thought that making policy concessions to the union bosses would have bought their support.  How wrong they were.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bush-executive-order-too-little-too-late-12022008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bush-executive-order-too-little-too-late-12022008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/public-sector-workers">Public Sector Workers</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:50:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3268 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush Administration -- Again -- Takes a Swipe at Employee Freedom</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bush-administration-07302008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Bush Administration is arguing Big Labor&#039;s legal positions in court again.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Right to Work supporters recall the Bush Administration&#039;s lousy record when it comes to employee free choice and worker freedom.  Solicitor General Paul Clement seemed to take pleasure in parroting union lawyer talking points in important legal proceedings like &lt;a href=&quot;/press/2007/06/u-s-supreme-court-rules-national-right-work-foundation-s-case-union-officials-have-no-&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Davenport v. Washington Education&lt;/i&gt; Association&lt;/a&gt;.  Before resigning in May, Clement &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor&quot;&gt;took another swipe&lt;/a&gt; at employee freedom in &lt;i&gt;Locke v. Karass&lt;/i&gt;, another Foundation case going to the Supreme Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bush-administration-07302008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bush-administration-07302008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/davenport">Davenport</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/locke">Locke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:48:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stefan Gleason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3142 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Solicitor General Paul Clement Resigns; But Not Soon Enough</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/solicitor-general-clement-resigns-right-work-advocates-breath-sigh-relief</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Solicitor General Paul Clement &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1094054&amp;amp;srvc=home&amp;amp;position=recent&quot;&gt;resigned&lt;/a&gt; yesterday after seven years with the Bush Administration.  As reported by Tony Mauro on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/05/praise-and-crit.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Legal Times&lt;/i&gt; blog&lt;/a&gt;, Right to Work advocates are thrilled to see him go:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;quot;Paul Clement did not leave soon enough,&amp;quot; said Stefan Gleason, vice president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation in a statement. &amp;quot;He kicked the cause of employee freedom from compulsory unionism in the teeth once again before heading out the door.&amp;quot;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/solicitor-general-clement-resigns-right-work-advocates-breath-sigh-relief&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/solicitor-general-clement-resigns-right-work-advocates-breath-sigh-relief#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:23:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3066 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Bush&#039;s Top Lawyer Taking Orders from Big Labor?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, the Bush administration&#039;s top lawyer, has just inflicted more damage on America&#039;s working men and women laboring under compulsory unionism. Does President Bush even know what his administration&#039;s lawyer is doing?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This week, the too-clever-by-half lawyer filed a brief in the National Right to Work Foundation&#039;s latest pending U.S. Supreme Court case, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/press/2008/02/u-s-supreme-court-re-examine-scope-union-dues-compelled-non-union-workers&quot;&gt;Locke v. Karass&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, and has taken a position that surely must please the union bosses. The High Court in &lt;i&gt;Locke &lt;/i&gt;will examine the criteria for determining how much non-union members must pay to a union where they do not enjoy the fundamental protection of a Right to Work law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-dues">Forced Dues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/maine">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:25:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stefan Gleason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3063 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
